مقایسه کارآیی روابط ترکیبی واسنجی شده و سیستم‌های هوشمند عصبی در برآورد تبخیر از پهنه‌های آزاد آب

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز، ایران

2 استادیار گروه علوم و مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

برآورد میزان تبخیر نقش مهمی در مطالعات هیدرولوژیکی در نواحی نیمه‌‌خشک دارد. به‌دلیل کمبود ایستگاه‌های تبخیرسنجی، استفاده از روش‌های تجربی و نیز کاربرد سیستم‌های هوشمند عصبی مورد توجه پژوهشگران قرار گرفته است. در مطالعه حاضر، مقادیر تبخیر از پهنه‌های آزاد آب در حوضه دریاچه ارومیه با استفاده از روش‌های تجربی ترکیبی شامل دبروین، تیچومروف، مایر و پنمن که برای حوضه دریاچه ارومیه واسنجی شدند و نیز سیستم‌های هوشمند عصبی شامل شبکه‌های عصبی مصنوعی (ANN)، جنگل‌های تصادفی (RF) و درختان گرادیان تقویت شده (GBT) برآورد شد. به‌منظور مدل‌سازی تبخیر با استفاده از روش‌های هوشمند، 14 سناریو حاصل از ترکیب عوامل هواشناسی به‌کار رفته در معادلات تجربی ترکیبی مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. نتایج به‌دست آمده با مقادیر تبخیر از پهنه‌های آزاد آبی حاصل از تشت تبخیر مقایسه شد. به‌منظور ارزیابی نتایج نیز از آماره‌های R، NRMSE، MAPE و دیاگرام تیلور استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد به‌طور کلی در بین روابط ترکیبی واسنجی‌شده، روش دبروین دقت بالاتری دارد. با این حال، مقادیر شاخص‌های خطای به‌دست آمده حاکی از عدم دقیق بودن روابط ترکیبی در برآورد تبخیر از پهنه‌های آزاد آب است. همچنین بر اساس نتایج به‌دست آمده، دقت روش‌های هوشمند عصبی در برآورد میزان تبخیر از پهنه‌های آزاد آب بیشتر از روش‌های ترکیبی است. در بین تمام روش‌های مورد مطالعه، روش ANN بالاترین دقت را در برآورد میزان تبخیر دارد. به‌طوری که این روش در 4 ایستگاه با مقادیر NRMSE کمتر از 10 درصد، به‌عنوان مدل دقیق معرفی شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of the Efficiency of Calibrated Combined Relations and Intelligent Neural Systems in Estimating Evaporation from Free Water Zones

نویسندگان [English]

  • vahid MOUNESKHAH 1
  • sajjad hashemi 1
  • moein hadi 1
  • Saeed Samadianfard 2
1 Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Iran
2 University of Tabriz
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives
Evaporation is one of the most important factors in the hydrological cycle and is one of the determinants of energy equations at the ground level and water balance, which is estimated in various fields such as meteorology, hydrology, agriculture, and water resources management. Evaporation is also one of the main causes of water loss and stress on water resources. Therefore, knowing its amount as one of the hydrological variables is very important in agricultural research and soil and water conservation and modeling. Evaporation is a physical process that has a direct and close relation with atmospheric factors, the most important of which are temperature, wind speed, relative humidity and solar radiation. Researchers have been able to analyze evaporation using mathematical and empirical methods and their combination, as well as using intelligent neural methods. Due to the importance of evaporation in the water cycle and its effect on the quantity and quality of surface water resources, the study and accurate knowledge of this phenomenon is one of the important issues in the study of water resources. Using pan evaporation is one of the most common methods of estimating evaporation. But in most areas, the number of evaporating stations is not enough and they do not have suitable spatial distribution. Therefore, indirect methods such as hybrid relations, intelligent neural systems, data mining methods and remote sensing techniques have been considered by researchers.
Methodology
In the present study, the evaporation of free water zones in the Urmia Lake basin has been estimated. For this purpose, the efficiency of combined empirical methods including deBruin, Tichomirov, Penman and Meyer as well as intelligent neural methods including artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF) and gradient boosted trees (GBT) were compared and evaluated using statistical indices of R, NRMSE, MAPE and also Taylor diagram. Moreover, in order to increase the accuracy and efficiency of the combined methods, these relations were calibrated for the Urmia Lake basin. In order to evaluate the different combinations of meteorological variables to estimate the evaporation of free water zones in intelligent neural systems, 14 scenarios were considered with the aim of increasing the accuracy of evaporation estimation. In these scenarios, various combinations of meteorological parameters were defined that were used as variables of the combined empirical relations to estimate evaporation of free water zones. Also, pan evaporation data were used to estimate the rate of evaporation of free water zones by applying the pan coefficient and the obtained results were used as a basis for evaluating combined methods and intelligent neural systems.
Findings
The results showed that among the studied combined methods at six considered stations, the deBruin method is more accurate than other methods. Only in Tekab station, the Meyer method with NMRSE value of 30.00% and MAPE of 19.99% had higher accuracy. After calibrating the relations, the deBruin method also had the highest accuracy in all stations compared to other relations. Among the intelligent neural methods in 4 of 7 studied stations, the ANN method was introduced as the best and most accurate intelligent method for estimating evaporation of free water levels. In Maragheh, Mahabad and Sarab stations, RF method had the highest accuracy, while in all of the stations, the GBT method had the weakest performance.
Conclusion
Despite the overall improvement in the results of the evaporation estimation and the reduction of the error values of the calibrated empirical combined relations, the NMRSE values indicated different efficiencies of the combined relations in estimating the evaporation of free water zones. So, the calibrated combined relations were not accurate at any of the stations. Moreover, evaluating the results of intelligent neural methods indicated the high accuracy of them compared to combined relations in estimating evaporation of free zones of water. Also, the obtained results showed that the temperature and radiation parameters in the model obtained from the best scenario of intelligent methods have been used in all stations, which indicated the importance of these two parameters in evaporation modeling. Also, the results showed that although the calibration of the relations generally improved the accuracy of the combined relations; however, according to the statistical analysis, the combined relations did not have the suitable accuracy in estimating evaporation. Therefore, the use of intelligent neural systems in estimating evaporation of free zones of water was recommended. Among all of the studied methods, the ANN method had the highest accuracy in estimating the pan evaporation. Thus, this method was introduced as an accurate model in 4 stations with NRMSE values less than 10%.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • empirical methods
  • evaporation
  • intelligent systems
  • modeling
  • Taylor diagram
Abtew W, 2001. Evaporation estimation for Lake Okeechobee in south Florida. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 127: 140-147.
 
Akbarzadeh MSH, Haghighatjou P and Bagheri MH, 2015. Estimates of evaporation from surface water bodies with SEBAL algorithm using remote sensing techniques (Case Study: Chahnimeh’s Fresh Water Reservoirs of Sistan). Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 3(9): 510-521. (In Persian with English abstract)
Alazard M, Leduc C, Travi Y, Boclet G and Ben Salem A, 2015. Estimating evaporation in semi-arid areas facing data scarcity: Example of the El Haouareb dam (Merguellil catchment, Central Tunisia). Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies 3: 265-284.
Bahmani R, Radmanesh F, Islamian SS and Parham GH, 2013. Reservoir evaporation trend analysis and its prediction using time series. Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 36(3): 67-80. (In Persian with English abstract)
Beer T, Li J and Alverson K, 2018. Global Change and Future Earth: The Geoscience Perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Breiman L, 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1): 5-32.
Click C, Malohlava M, Candel A, Roark H and Parmar V, 2016. Gradient Boosted Models with H2O. H2O.ai, United States of America.
Eslamian SS, Gohari SA, Biabanaki M and Malekian R, 2008. Estimating of monthly pan evaporation using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Journal of Applied Science 8(19): 3497-3502.
Freund Y and Schapire RE, 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 55(1):119-139.
Friedman JH, 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 38(4):367-378.
Ghobadian R, Yaghoubi M and Taleb Heydari M, 2008. Preparation of evaporation prediction model from the free surface in the city of Kermanshah using artificial neural network and comparison with existing experimental relations. Third Water Resources Management Conference, 14 October, Tabriz, Iran. (In Persian).
Gleckler PJ, Taylor KE and Doutriaux C, 2008. Performance metrics for climate models. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres 113(D6): 1-20.
Hastie T, Tibshirani R and Friedman JH, 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2nd edition.
Imam Dost S, Shahanzari A and Taghavi J, 2018. Determination of evaporation from free surface water in Mazandaran Plain (Dazmirkandeh Abbandan) and compared with seven experimental methods. Journal of Watershed Management Research 10(18): 241-249. (In Persian with English abstract)
Irmak S, Haman D and Jones JW, 2002. Evaluations of class A pan coefficients for estimating reference evapotranspiration in a humid location. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 128 (3): 153-159.
Jin J, 2012. A random forest-based method for urban land cover classification using LiDAR data and aerial imagery. MSc Thesis, University of Waterloo.
Kotsiantis S and Pintelas P, 2004. Combining bagging and boosting. International Journal of Computational Intelligence 1(4): 324-33.
Kuan CM and White H, 1994. Artificial neural networks: An econometric perspective. Econometric Reviews 13: 1-91.
Menhaj MB, 2005. Computational Intelligence. Third Edition, Amir Kabir University of Technology Press, Iran (In Persian).
Mouneskhah V, 2018. Estimating evaporation losses and providing solutions for its reduction in the reservoirs of Lake Urmia eastern basin using modern methods. MSc Thesis, University of Tabriz. (In Persian with English abstract).
Mouneskhah V, Samadianfard S and Hadi M, 2020. Evaluation of data mining methods and experimental temperature-radiation-based models in estimating evaporation from the pan (Case study: East of Urmia Lake). Iran Water and Soil Researches 51(9): 2337-2348. (In Persian with English abstract)
Qasem S, Samadianfard S, Kheshtgar S, Jarhan S, Kisi O, Shamshirband SH and Wing-Chau K, 2019. Modeling monthly pan evaporation using wavelet support vector regression and wavelet artificial neural networks in arid and humid climates. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 13(1): 177-187.
Rosenberry DO, Winter TC, Buso DC and Likens GE, 2007. Comparison of 15 evaporation methods applied to a small mountain lake in the northeastern USA. Journal of Hydrology 340: 149-166.
Sattari MT, Ahmadifar V and Pashapour Kholf Ansar R, 2014. M5 tree model based modeling of evaporation losses in Eleviyan reservoir and comparison with empirical equations. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering 17: 107-121. (In Persian with English abstract).
Sepaskhah AR, 2018. Evaporation reduction from water reservoir of dams. Strategic Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources 3(1):13-26. (In Persian with English abstract)
Shadmani M and  Marofi S, 2011. Comparison of some methods for estimation of daily pan evaporation: Case study in Kerman region. Journal of Science and Technology of Agriculture and Natural Resources 15(55): 69-83. (In Persian with English abstract).
Singh AK, Tripathy R and Chopra UK, 2008. Evaluation of CERES Wheat and Crop Systmodels for water-nitrogen interactions in wheat crop. Agricultural Water Management 95: 776-786.
Talebizadeh M, Morid S, Ayyoubzadeh SA and Ghasemzadeh M, 2009. Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resources Management 24 (9): 1747-1761.
Tanny J, Cohen S, Assouline S, Lange F, Grava A, Berger D, Teltch B and Parlange MB, 2008. Evaporation from a small water reservoir: direct measurements and estimates. Journal of Hydrology 351: 218-229.
Taylor KE, 2001. Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research. Atmospheres 106: 7183-7192.
Terzi O, 2011. Modeling of daily pan evaporation of Lake Egirdir using data-driven techniques. Pp. 320-324. International Symposium on Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications. Istanbul, Turkey.
Vanzyl WH, De Jager JM and Maree CJ, 1989. The relationship between daylight evaporation from short vegetation and the USWB Class A pan. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 46: 107-118.