Comparison of the arrangement of Geotextile Filter in the Subsurface Water Intakes with Vertical Risers Regarding Sediment Control

Authors

1 1- Former M.Sc. Student., Water Eng. Dept., Faculty of Agric., Univ. of Shahrekord, Iran

2 Assoc. Prof., Water Eng. Dep., Faculty of agriculture, Shahrekord University, Iran

Abstract

One of the problems associated with the sub-surface water intake systems is the sediment inflow control, which is usually solved by a filtration system. Geotextile filter is one of the filter types for controlling sediment in the subsurface water intakes. In this research in order to investigate the capability of geotextile filter for filtration of water through the sub-surface vertical pipe intake, various experiments with different arrangement of the geotextile were carried out in a flume with the height of 1.2 m, width of 0.5 m and a length of 5 m, located in Soil Mechanics Laboratory of Shahrekord University. Based on the dimensional analysis, the effective parameters on the discharge capacity and the filtration efficiency were identified. The results showed that the different arrangements of the geotextile filters (laminated and rolled geotextile sheets) did not show a significant impact on flow capacity of the system. The results also showed that the sediment trap efficiency for rolled geotextile sheets was obtained 60 to 70 percent but it was about 80 to 90 percent for the laminated geotextile sheets. It indicates that the laminated geotextile sheets controlle the sediment by 36.6% more than the rolled geotextile sheets.

Keywords


Ade F, Long D, Savatsky L and Wu S, 2001. Laboratory testing of sediment trap efficiency of seepage flow    through rock fill dike. Bridging the Gap: Meeting the world's Water and Environmental Resources Challenges. May 20. ASCE 111-186.
Akramnia A, 1393. In vitro evaluation of geotextiles used in subsurface reservoirs to physical water treatment. MSc thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Water Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Anonymous, 1388. Manual of river water withdrawal structures and system protection. Administrative office of water and wastewater strategic planning and monitoring Engineering and technical criteria.
Bouazza A, Zorenberg J, Mc Cartney J and Singh R, 2013. Unsaturated Geotechnics applied to geoenvironmental engineering problems involving geosynthe Engineering geology 165: 143-153.
Fattahi R and Haszpra O, 2004. Analysis of perforated-pipe water collector system. International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research. Journal of Hydraulic Research 42 (1): 89-96.
Honar T, Mazloum shahraki S, 2013. Effect of Submerged Vanes on Intake Ratio of Lateral Intakes. Water and Soil Science- University of Tabriz 24: 205-214.
Kamanbedast A and Shafai Bajestan M, 1387. In vitro evaluation of slope and grain size distributions in the amount of sediment in the basin floor. Second National Conference on Irrigation and Drainage network management, 20 Jun, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Iran.
Kurosh Vahid F and Esmaili K, 1392. The effect of hydraulic conditions (clear water) raised pond upstream of the porous media flow rate deviation. Scientific Journal of Agricultural Science and Irrigation Engineering 36: 47 - 59.
Mucha I, Bansky U, Hlavaty Z and Rodak D, 2006. Impact of river bed clogging-colmatation-on ground water. Journal of Riverbank Filtration Hydraulic 60 (4): 43-72.
Muthukomaran A, E and Lamparuthi K, 2006. Laboratory studies on Geotextile filters as used in Geotextile tube dewatering.Geotextiles and Geomemberanes  24(4): 210-219.
Orth J, Chardonnet E, and Meynardi G, 1954. Study of bottom type water intake grids. Houille Blanche 3: 345-351.
Sakhtivadivel R and Einstein H, A, 1970. Clogging of porous column of spheres by sediment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 96(2):461-47.
Shelma S, N, 1996. Flow through orifices at low Reynolds numbers. First International Ph. D. Symposium. Technical University of Budapest.