The Effect of Biochar, Leonardite and Coal on Some Quality Characteristics of Compost Resulting from The Co-composting of Manure and Forest Organic Matter

Authors

1 Soil Science Dept,Faculty of Agriculture

2 Former graduated student, Soil Science Dept,, University ofTabriz

3 Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center

4 CEO of Qizil Topraq Sahand Company

5 Scientific staff of University of Tabriz

Abstract

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Composting is an effective approach to organic waste management, but it also has disadvantages such as greenhouse gases emission (CH4, CO2, and N2O), bad smells, nitrogen loss, and contamination of soil and water resources. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a method to reduce gas emissions and improve the quality of compost at the same time. To overcome these disadvantages, some additives are usually used. The use of additives at the beginning of the composting process to produce valuable compost is known as "co-composting". Various materials can be incorporated into waste during composting. These materials fall into three categories: organic, mineral, biological, or a combination of these. Some of these added materials serve as bulking agents, primarily affecting the physical structure of the compost (such as aeration). However, most of the time, these substrates also have direct or indirect impacts on other composting factors and can be considered as additives. Additives play a role in enhancing the composting process by reducing leaching and gas emissions, improving aeration, accelerating organic matter breakdown, and enhancing nutrient content and availability in the final product. The research published so far showed that the effect of wood biochar along with leonardite and coal on the quality of compost obtained from animal manure and forest organic matter had not been studied in Iran, and considering the importance of the feasibility of improving the quality of compost, this research was conducted.
Methodology
In this research, the effect of wood biochar, leonardite and coal on some characteristics and quality indices of the co-compost of animal manure and forest organic matter was studied. The biochar was produced at 400° C from the pyrolysis of mixed pruning plum and pomegranate brunches. Leonardite and coal were also prepared from companies active in this field. The experiment was conducted as a factorial in a completely random basic design with three replications. The first factor of treatment included wood biochar, leonardite and coal at two levels of 2 and 4% by dry weight and the second factor of time included 12 weeks. During the composting process, temperature, pH, EC, total nitrogen concentration, organic carbon content and some quality indices of composting such as humification index (HR), humification ratio (HI), degree of polymerization (DP) and total materials Humic (HS) were measured.
Findings
According to the results, the treatments were significantly different from the control regarding the temperature of the compost pile, and the coal treatment showed the highest temperature at the level of 2%, and the duration of the thermophilic phase in the leonardite treatment was 2% longer than the other treatments. Among the additives, 2% and 4% leonardite treatments created the highest total nitrogen content in the compost. The additives used in this research did not make a significant difference in compost pH, but coal at the level of 4% caused a significant increase in electrical conductivity (EC). Biochar and coal increased organic carbon concentration in the compost pile. Leonardite treatments of 2% and 4% produced the highest values of humification indices (HS, DP, HI, HR), but they were not significantly different from each other. The biochar used in this research increased the C/N ratio of co-compost.
Conclusion
In general, leonardite treatments were found to be useful in terms of the indicators of final compost and biochar and coal treatments to accelerate composting in the early stages. But the results of this research showed that it can be used at the end of composting processes in order to enrich and improve the quality of the produced compost. The results of this research showed that considering the costs of raw materials, coal is a suitable treatment to accelerate the production and improve the quality of compost. The results obtained about the effect of biochar obviously cannot be generalized to all biochars and different results may be obtained depending on the type of biomass and pyrolysis conditions. Therefore, it is recommended to use the combination of organic and biological or organic and inorganic additives in future research. Other traits such as indices of microbial contamination and abundance of weed seeds should also be measured and the effect of treatments should be studied. Finally, it is recommended to study the effect of final compost on the characteristics of calcareous and acidic soils.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Adani F, Genevini P, Tambone F and Montoneri E, 2006. Compost effect on soil humic acid: a NMR study. Chemosphere 65: 1414–1418.
Adani F, Genevini PL, Gasperi F and Tambone F, 1999. Composting and humification. Compost Science & Utilization 7(7): 24–33.
Akdeniz N, 2019. A systematic review of biochar use in animal waste composting. Waste Management 88: 291–300.
Amir S, Benlboukht F, Cancian N, Winterton P and Hafidi M, 2008. Physico-chemical analysis of tannery solid waste and structural characterization of its isolated humic acids after composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 160(2–3): 448–455.
ASTM, 2007. Standard Method for Chemical Analysis of Wool Charcoal. D1762-84, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
 Awasthi MK, Wang Q, Chen H, Awasthi SK, Wang M, Ren X and Zhang Z, 2018. Beneficial effect of mixture of additives amendment on enzymatic activities, organic matter degradation and humification during biosolids co-composting. Bioresource Technology 247: 138-146.
Barthod J, Rumpel C and Dignac MF, 2018. Composting with additives to improve organic amendments. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38(2): 1–23.
Behera S and Samal K, 2022. Sustainable approach to manage solid waste through biochar assisted composting. Energy Nexus 7: 100121.
Bernal MP, Paredes C, Monedero MA and Cegarra J, 1998. Maturity and stabili parameters of compost prepared with a wide range of organic waste. Bioresource Technology 63: 91-99.
Bremner JM, 1996. Nitrogen-total. Pp. 1085–1121. In: Sparks DL, (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3, Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA.
Busato JG, Lima LS, Aguiar NO, Canellas LP and Olivares FL, 2012. Changes in labile phosphorus forms during maturation of vermicompost enriched with phosphorus-solubilizing and diazotrophic bacteria. Bioresource Technology 110: 390–395.
Bustamante MA, Paredes C, Marhuenda-Egea FC, Pérez-Espinosa A, Bernal MP and Moral R, 2008. Co-composting of distillery wastes with animal manures: Carbon and nitrogen transformations in the evaluation of compost stability. Chemosphere 72: 551–557.
Campbell AG, Flok RL and Tripcpi R, 1997. Wood ash as an amendment in municipalsludge and yard waste composting process. Compost Science & Utilization 5(1): 62–73.
Carter MR and Gregorich EG, 2007. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. CRC press.
Chen YX, Huang XD, Han ZY, Huang X, Hu B, Shi DZ,and Wu WX, 2010. Effects of bamboo charcoal, and bamboo vinegar on nitrogen conservation, and heavy metals immobility during pig manure composting. Chemosphere 78(9): 1177-1181.
Chung WJ, Chang S, Chaudhary DK, Shin J, Kim H, Karmegam N and Ravindran B, 2021. Effect of biochar amendment on compost quality, gaseous emissions and pathogen reduction during in-vessel composting of chicken manure. Chemosphere 283: 131129.
Dias BO, Silva CA, Higashikawa FS, Roig A and Sánchez-Monedero MA, 2010. Use of biochar as bulking agent for the composting of poultry manure: effect on organic matter degradation and humification. Bioresource Technology 101(4): 1239-1246.
Doublet J, Francou C, Poitrenaud M and Houot S, 2011. Influence of bulking agents on organic matter evolution during sewage sludge composting; consequences on compost organic matter stability and N availability. Bioresource Technology 102(2): 1298–1307.
Epstein E, 1997. The Science of Composting. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster.UK.
Gabhane J, William SP, Bidyadhar R, Bhilawe P, Anand D, Vaidya AN and Wate SR, 2012. Additives aided composting of green waste: effects on organic matter degradation, compost maturity, and quality of the finished compost. Bioresource Technology 114: 382–388.
Goyal S, Dhull SK and Kapoor KK, 2005. Chemical and biological changes during composting of different organic wastes and assessment of compost maturity. Bioresource Technology 96(14): 1584–1591.
Helal AA, Murad GA and Helal AA, 2011. Characterization of different humic materials by various analytical techniques. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 4: 51–54.
Hemati A, 2017. Isolation of thermophile ligninolytic microorganisms for acceleration of compost production and its quality improvement. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, Tabriz University. (in Persian with English abstract)
Jalili M, Mokhtari M, Eslami H, Abbasi F, Ghanbari R and Ebrahimi AA, 2019. Toxicity evaluation and management of co-composting pistachio wastes combined with cattle manure and municipal sewage sludge. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 171: 798-804.
Jiang JS, Kang K, Wang CJ, Sun XJ, Dang S, Wang N, Wang Y, Zhang CY, Yan GX and Li YB, 2018. Evaluation of total greenhouse gas emissions during sewage sludge composting by the different dicyandiamide added forms: mixing, surface broadcasting, and their combination. Waste Management 81: 94–103.
Kumar R, Singh S and Singh OV, 2008. Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 35(5): 377–391.
Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC and Crowley D, 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota–a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 43(9): 1812–1836.
Li D, Manu MK, Varjani S and Wong JW, 2023. Role of tobacco, and bamboo biochar on food waste digestate co-composting: Nitrogen conservation, greenhouse gas emissions, and compost quality. Waste Management 156: 44-54.
Li G, Zhu QH, Niu QQ, Meng QR, Yan HL, Wang SS and Li QL, 2021. The degradation of organic matter coupled with the functional characteristics of microbial community during composting with different surfactants. Bioresource Technology 321: 124446.
Li R, Wang JJ, Zhang Z, Shen F, Zhang G, Qin R, Li X and Xiao R, 2012. Nutrient transformations during composting of pig manure with bentonite. Bioresource Technology 121: 362–368.
Liu Z, Wang D, Ning T, Zhang S, Yang Y, He Z and Li Z, 2017. Sustainability assessment of straw utilization circulation modes based on the emergetic ecological footprint. Ecological Indicators 75: 1–7.
Machovic V, Mizera J, Sykorova I and Borecká L, 2000. Ion-exchange properties of Czech oxidized coals. Acta Montana 117: 15–26.
Malińska K, Zabochnicka-Świątek M and Dach J, 2014. Effects of biochar amendment on ammonia emission during composting of sewage sludge. Ecological Engineering 71: 474–478.
Manu MK, Wang C, Li D, Varjani S, Xu Y, Ladumor N, Lui M, Zhou J and Wong JW, 2021. Biodegradation kinetics of ammonium enriched food waste digestate compost with biochar amendment. Bioresource Technology 341: 125871.
Mao H, Lv Z, Sun H, Li R, Zhai B, Wang Z and Zhou L, 2018. Improvement of biochar and bacterial powder addition on gaseous emission and bacterial community in pig manure compost. Bioresource Technology 258: 195-202.
Nadiri AA, Gharekhani M, Khatibi R, Sadeghfam S and Moghaddam AA, 2017. Groundwater vulnerability indices conditioned by supervised intelligence committee machine (SICM). Science of the Total Environment 574: 691–706.
Nguyen MK, Lin C, Hoang HG, Sanderson P, Dang BT, Bui XT, Nguyen NSH, Vo DVN and Tran HT, 2022. Evaluate the role of biochar during the organic waste composting process: A critical review. Chemosphere 299: 134488.
Olivella MA, Del Rio JC and  Palacios J, 2001. Characterization of humic acid from leonarditecoal: an integrated study of PY-GC-MS, XPS and XANES techniques. Journal of Anaiytical and Applied Pyrolysis 63(2002): 59-68.
Peters J, 2003. Recommended Methods of Manure Analysis. Cooperative Extension publishing, University of Wisconsin.
Qi BC, Aldrich C and Lorenzen L, 2004. Effect of ultrasonication on the humic acids extracted from lignocellulose substrate decomposed by anaerobic digestion. Chemical Engineering Journal 98: 153-163.
Qu FT, Wu D, Li D, Zhao Y, Zhang RJ, Qi HS and Chen XM, 2022. Effect of Fenton pretreatment combined with bacterial inoculation on dissolved organic matter concentration during rice straw composting. Bioresource Technology 344: 126198
Rasapoor M, Nasrabadi T, Kamali M and Hoveidi H, 2009. The effects of aeration rate on generated compost quality, using aerated static pile method. Waste Management 29: 570–573.
Sajib SK and Adhikari S, 2020. Effect of pyrolysis method on physical properties of activated biochar and its application as cathode material for lithium-sulfur battery. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 63(2): 485-493.
Sanchez-Monedero MA, Roig A, Cegarra J and Bernal MP, 1999. Relationships between water-soluble carbohydrate and phenol fractions and the humification indices of different organic wastes during composting. Bioresource Technology 70: 193–201.
Veeken A, Nierop K, Wilde VD and Hamelers B, 2000. Characterisation of NaOH-extracted humic acids during composting of a biowaste. Bioresource Technology 72: 33-41.
Wang C, Tu QQ, Dong D, Strong PJ, Wang HL, Sun B and Wu WX, 2014. Spectroscopic evidence for biochar amendment promoting humic acid synthesis and intensifying humification during composting. Journal of Hazardous Materials 280: 409–416
Wang Z, Xu Y, Yang T, Liu Y, Zheng T and Zheng C, 2023. Effects of biochar carried microbial agent on compost quality, greenhouse gas emission, and bacterial community during sheep manure composting. Biochar 5(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-022-00202-w