Effect of Bacillus simplex as a growth promoting bacterium on some growth characteristic of Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) Seedling at Different Water Conditions

Authors

1 University of Maragheh

2 Department of Plant Genetics and Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Maragheh University, Iran

Abstract

Background an Objectives
Water shortage and the occurrence of drought is a major challenge in agriculture. By 2050, Iran will experience a 2.6 0C increase in temperature and a 35% decrease in rainfal. Plant growth promoting bacteria could alleviate the water stress effect on crops. Auxin and ACC-deaminase production are best known for their mechanisms of action, but recently extracellular polysachrid (EPS) production was considered. EPS could support bacterial life by absorbing water and keeping the hydrative environment around bacteria. In such situations, plants are indirectly affected by increasing available water as well as getting enough time to genetic responses to water deficit. Bacteria of the genus Bacillus are considered as one of the most important microbes in the rhizosphere of plants. Their ability to form dormant spores resistant to heat and dehydration makes them a desirable option in biofertilizers production. Moreover, using extracellular polymer producing strains for plants inoculation maybe more successful compared to other bacteria. So far, no study has been reported on the effect of EPS producing Bacillus simplex inoculation on plants growth. Therefore, this research study was carried out to investigate the effect of this bacterium on pepper seedling under different watering conditions.
Methodology
Bacillus simplex selected as a plant growth promoting bacterium (PGPB) due to the ability of auxin and ACC-deaminase production. This bacterium was obtained from the soil biology lab collection at the University of Maragheh. Its tolerance to water shortage and EPS production was evaluated by culturing it on nutrient agar medium treated with polyethylene glycol (PEG) to simulate water stress conditions. To assess the effects of EPS-producing B. simplex on pepper growth, a greenhouse experiment was conducted. The experiment was conducted as factorial in a completly randomised design with three replications. The experimental treatments consisted of B. simplex inoculation and three different soil water states, namely 80%, 60%, and 40% of the soil's field capacity water content.
The plants were harvested after 50 days of planting date and various parameters were recorded. These included total dry weight, leaf surface area, leaf dry weight, root dry weight, root fresh weight, root volume, specific leaf area (SLA), specific leaf weight (SLW), leaf weight ratio (LWR), root length, root surface area, root diameter, and root surface area density.


Findings
Based on visual evaluations, it was observed that the bacterial colonies of B. simplex exhibited significant changes under water stress conditions compared to non-stressed conditions. The colony color changed from milky to semi-transparent, and its fluidity and stickiness increased in PEG nutrient agar containing PRG compared to nutrient agar medium.
Its inoculation could significantly increase the total dry weight of aerial organs by 23%, 27% and 46% and the dry weight of the leaves by 15%, 19% and 37%, respectively, under normal watering, moderate and severe water stress conditions. The leaf area increased respectively by 12% and 29% just in the conditions of moderate and severe water stress. Bacterial inoculation in normal watering and medium water stress conditions increased the root dry weight by 37% and 42%, respectively, but the wet weight of root in severe water stress decreased by 28%. The inoculation of studied bacterium caused to increase root volume by 27%, 31% and, 51% and root surface by 16%, 20% and 38% respectively, under normal watering and modarate and severe water stress conditions. Root diameter, root tissue density and root surface density increased, by 38%, 29% and 17%, respectively, at severe water stress conditions by bacterial inoculation. The regression relationship between root traits and the total dry weight of the aerial part of pepper showed that there is a direct and significant correlation between them. Root dry weight, root fresh weight, root volume, explanation factor, root length, root surface density, root tissue density, and root surface area showed positive correlations with the total dry weight of the pepper seedlings. The coefficients of determination (R2) for these relationships were 0.86, 0.86, 0.86, 0.90, 0.91, 0.91, 0.60, and 0.91, respectively. However, there was no correlation between the total dry weight and leaf indicators.

Conclusion
Based on the correlation coefficients between the total dry weight of pepper seedlings and their root and leaf traits, it appears that the increase in yield by B. simplex is associated with improvement in the characteristics of both leaves and roots, particularly under severe water stress conditions. Bacterial metabolites, such as auxin, are known to stimulate root growth, root size, weight, and branching, which ultimately leads to a larger soil volume accessible to the plant and improved nutrient availability, thus enhancing overall plant yield. Therefore, based on the results the use of B. simplex might improve the establishment of pepper plants in all soil water conditions, particularly under water deficit conditions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Akhavan S, Shabanpour M and Isfahani M, 2012. The effect of soil density and texture on the growth of roots and shoots of wheat. Journal of Water and Soil (Agricultural Science and Technology) 26 (3): 735–727.
Ali SZ, Sandhya V and Rao LV, 2014. Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Annals of Microbiology 64: 493–502.
Bauhus J and Messier C, 1999. Evaluation of fine root length and diameter measurements obtained using RHIZO image analysis. Agronomy Journal 91: 142–147.
Boucher FC, Verboom GA, Musker S and Ellis AG, 2017. Plant size: a key determinant of diversification? New Phytologist. 216: 24.
Casper BB, Forseth IN, Kempenich H, Seltzer S and Xavier K, 2001. Drought prolongs leaf life span in the herbaceous desert perennial Cryptantha flava. Functional Ecology 15 (6): 740–747.
Clark R and Lee SH, 2016. Anticancer properties of capsaicin against human cancer. Anticancer Research 36: 837–850.
Dagdelen N, Yilmaz E, Sezgin F and Gurbuz T, 2004. Effects of water stress at different growth stages on processing pepper (Capsicum annum Cv. Kapija) yield water use and quality characteristics. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 7: 2167–2172.
Dimkpa C, Weinand T and Asch F, 2009. Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell and Environment 32:1682-1694.
Donot F, Fontana A, Baccou JC and Schorr-Galindo S, 2012. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction. Carbohydrate Polymers 87: 951–962.
Fazli M, Almblad H, Rybtke ML, Givskov M, Eberl L and Tolker-Nielsen T, 2014. Regulation of biofilm formation in P. seudomonas and B. urkholderia species. Environ. Microbiol. 16: 1961–1981.
Fort F, Jouany C and Cruz P. 2013. Root and leaf functional trait relations in Poaceae species: implications of differing resource- acquisition strategies. Journal of Plant Ecology 6: 211-219.
Fravel D, 2005. Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annual Review of Phytopathology 43: 337-359.
Ghasemzadeh Z, Parhizkar M, Zomorodian M, Shamsi R, Meygooni SM and Shabanpour Ma, 2023.The role of extracellular polysaccharide produced by Bradyrhizobium strain in root growth, improvement of soil aggregate stability and reduction of soil detachment capacity. Rhizosphere 27:2452-2198
Ghosh D, Gupta  A and Mohapatra S, 2019. A comparative analysis of exopolysaccharide and phytohormone secretions by four drought‑tolerant rhizobacterial strains and their impact on osmotic‑stress mitigation in Arabidopsis thaliana. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 35: 90. 
Karimi E, Aliasgharzad N, Mousavi SB and Alilo A, 2022. The effect of growth promoting bacteria on barley yield and morphological root characteristics under different water conditions. Journal of Soil and Plant Interactions 13 (2):67-81. (in Persian with English abstract)
Karimi E, Aliasgharzad N, Neyshabouri MR and Esfandyari E, 2019. Isolation, molecular identification and assessing plant growth promoting activities of biofilm forming bacteria from gramineae rhizosphere in north west of Iran. Journal of Soil Applied Research 7(2): 14–28. (in Persian with English abstract)
Karimi E, 2022. The effect of Peribacillus simplex bacterium on the growth of Mentha piprita L. in different watering regimes. Journal of Plant Process and Function 12 (54): 353-369. (in Persian with English abstract)
Khan LA and Lee IJ, 2016. Indol acetic acid and ACC deaminase from endophytic bacteria improves the growth of Solanum lycopersicum. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 21: 58–64.
Khan N, Bano A, Rahman MA, Rathinasabapathi B and Babar MA, 2019. UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 42, 115–132.
Kim YC, Glick B, Bashan Y and Ryu CM, 2013. Enhancement of plant drought tolerance by microbes. In: Aroca R, (Ed.), Plant Responses to Drought Stress. Springer–Verlag, Berlin.
Konnova SA, Brykova OS, Sachkova OA, Egorenkova IV and Ignatov VV, 2001. Protective role of the polysaccharide containing capsular components of Azospirillum brasilense. Microbiology 70: 436–440.
Kroon H and Visser EJW, 2003. Root Ecology. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 397 p.
Lambers H, Atkin OK and Millenaar FF, 2002. Respiratory patterns in roots in relation to their functioning. Pp. 521–552. In: Waisel Y, Eshel A and Kafkaki K, (eds.), Plant Roots, Hidden Half, Ed 3 Marcel Dekker, New York.
Lawlor DW and TezaraW, 2009. Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water- deficient leaf cells: A critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Annals of Botany103: 561–579.
Lin LC, 2016. Growth effect of Cinnamomum kanehirae cuttings associated with its dark septate endophytes. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 19: 299-305.
Liu M, Wang Z, Li S, Lu X, Wang X and Han X, 2017. Changes in specific leaf area of dominant plants in temperate grasslands along a 2500-km transect in northern China. Scientific Reports 7: 10780.
Long W and Ding Y, 2011. Within- and among-species variation in specific leaf area drive community assembly in a tropical cloud forest. Oecologia 167: 1103–1113.
Lozano YM, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Flaig IC and Rillig MC, 2020. Root trait responses to drought are more heterogeneous than leaf trait responses. Functional Ecology 34: 2224–2235.
Mancosu N, Snyder RL, Kyriakakis G and Spano D, 2015. Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 7: 975-992.
Marron N, Dreyer E, Boudouresque E; Delay D; Petit JM; Delmotte FM and Brignolas F, 2003. Impact of successive drought and re-watering cycles on growth and specific leaf area of two Populus canadensis (Moench) clones,"Dorskamp"and "Luisa_Avanzo"". Tree Physiology 23 (18): 1225–1235.
Moran JF, Becana M, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Frechilla S, Klucas RV and Aparicio-Tejo P, 1994. Drought induces oxidative stress in pea plants. Planta 194: 346–352.
Murata N and Takahashi S, 2008. How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition? Trends in Plant Science 4: 178–182.
Naseem H, Ahsan M, Shahid MA and Khan N, 2018. Exopolysaccharides producing rhizobacteria and their role in plant growth and drought tolerance. Journal of Basic Microbiology 58:1009–1022.
Nemeskéri E, Horváth KZ, Andryei B, Ilahy R, Takács S, Neményi A, Pék Z and Helyes L, 2020. Impact of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation on the physiological response and roductivity traits of field-grown tomatoes in Hungary. Horticulturae 8: 641.
Osakabe Y, Osakabe K, Shinozaki K and Tran SP, 2014. Response of plants to water stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:86.
Poorter H, Niinemets Ü, Poorter L, Wright IJ and Villar R, 2009. Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): A meta‐analysis. New Phytologist 182: 565–588.
Roberson EB and Firestone MK, 1992. Relationship between desiccation and exopolysaccharide production in soil Pseudomonas sp. Applied Environmental Microbiology 58: 1284–1291.
Siefert A, Violle C, Chalmandrier L, Albert CH, Taudiere A, Fajardo A, Aarssen LW, Baraloto C, Carlucci MB and Cianciaruso MV, 2015. A global meta-analysis of the relative extent of intraspecific trait variation in plant communities. Ecology Letters 18: 1406–1419.
Vaghefi SA, Keykhai M, Jahanbakhshi F, Sheikholeslami J, Ahmadi A, Yang H and Abbaspour KC, 2019.  The future of extreme climate in Iran. Scientific Reports 9: 1464.
Verslues PE and Bray EA, 2004. LWR1 and LWR2 are required for osmoregulation and osmotic adjustment in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology 136(1): 2831–2842.
Vinocur B and Altman A, 2005. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16: 123-132.
Zhang HH, Tang M, Chen H and Wang YJ, 2012. Effects of dark septate endophytic isolate LBF-2 on medicinal plant Lycium barbarum L. Journal of Microbiology 50: 91-96
Zhou G, Zhou X, Nie Y, Bai SH, Zhou L, Shao J and Fu Y, 2018. Drought-induced changes in root biomass largely result from altered root morphological traits: Evidence from a synthesis of global field trials. Plant, Cell and Environment 41: 2589–2599.
Zhou H, Zhou G, He Q, Zhou L, Ji Y and Zhou M, 2020. Environmental explanation of maize specific leaf area under varying water stress regimes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 171: 103932.
 
 
 
Water and Soil Science
Volume 34, Issue 3
August 2024
Pages 125-141

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics