Synthesis of slow release nanofertilizers of zinc and copper and their effect on the availability of these elements in lettuce

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Sciences and Engineering, College of Agriculture, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran

2 Ph.D Water Resources Engineerin, Lorestan Science and Technology Park, Khorramabad, Iran

Abstract

Background an Objectives
The utilization of traditional micronutrients faces certain constraints, such as the significant retention of micronutrients in the soil. This can occur due to robust adsorption reactions to clays and organic matter, or the formation of insoluble compounds in the soil. These factors greatly diminish the effectiveness of micronutrient fertilizers. The environmental concerns and limited effectiveness linked to conventional fertilizers motivate the pursuit of innovative fertilizers with delayed release and enhanced performance. A possible solution that has been explored for these issues is the utilization of slow-release fertilizers (SRFs) or controlled-release fertilizers (CRFs). These fertilizers deliver vital nutrients to plants at a slower pace compared to conventional fertilizers. The release mechanisms of these CRFs are dependent on either diffusion through their coating or gradual hydrolysis. Yet, soil characteristics like moisture level, pH, ion concentration, and temperature also play a role in influencing nutrient release through hydrolysis or diffusion. Hence, there exists a potential disparity between the speed at which micronutrients are released into the soil and the necessary pace of nutrient absorption by crops. Graphene oxide (GO) stands out as a common material for crafting slow-release fertilizers (SRFs). Given GO's strong affinity for metal ions and its role in ferrying therapeutic compounds, it's logical to envision GO being effectively employed as a transporter for plant micronutrients. In this study, we introduce an innovative approach to tackle these constraints, showcasing the utility of GO sheets as novel carriers for efficiently loading plant micronutrients. This technique finds application in creating advanced fertilizers that enable gradual and sustained release.
Methodology
In this document, we present the creation of a novel carrier system using sheets of graphene oxide (GO). These sheets are capable of efficiently carrying plant micronutrients, allowing for a controlled and gradual release. To demonstrate this idea, we utilized zinc (Zn) and copper (Cu) as examples of micronutrients, loading them onto the GO sheets to formulate a fertilizer based on GO. We verified the chemical composition and successful loading of both nutrients onto the GO sheets using techniques such as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis.
Findings
The prepared Zn-graphene oxide (Zn−GO) and Cu-graphene oxide (Cu−GO) fertilizers showed a biphasic dissolution behavior compared to that of commercial zinc sulfate and copper sulfate fertilizer granules, displaying desirable fast and slow micronutrient release. A visualization method and chemical analysis were used to assess the release and diffusion of Cu and Zn in soil from GO-based fertilizers compared with commercial soluble fertilizers to demonstrate the advantages of GO carriers and show their capability to be used as a generic platform for macro- and micronutrients delivery. The results of kinetic rate of adsorption show a significant increase in adsorption of both ions at the beginning of the process (first 10 min), with slow increase after 10−20 min and reaching the maximum after 120 min. In the case of ZnSO4 and Zn−GO granules, similar amounts of Zn were recovered at >9 mm from the granules, 28 and 25%, respectively. In soil with CuSO4 granules, 29 % of the fertilizer Cu was recovered at >9 mm, whereas in soil with Cu−GO granules, 18 % of the fertilizer Cu was recovered in this zone. A pot trial demonstrated that Zn and Cu uptake by lettuce was higher when using GO-based fertilizers compared to that when using standard zinc or copper salts.
Conclusion
The findings revealed that solid pellet forms of micronutrient fertilizers (Zn−GO and Cu−GO) exhibited a notable capacity for nutrient retention (over 10%). This capacity is attributed to GO's substantial surface area and numerous oxygen binding sites on its surface and edges, facilitating the binding of micronutrient ions. The carrier based on GO exhibited a two-phase nutrient release profile, enabling the supply of micronutrients through both rapid release (approximately 40% within 5 hours) and gradual sustained release. This release pattern is highly advantageous for crops, as it meets the high nutrient demands during seedling establishment and provides a slower, continuous release during later growth stages. The impressive nutrient retention and favorable release properties of GO-based carriers make them an attractive choice for loading various nutrients (both macro and micro) and their combinations. Consequently, they have the potential to serve as versatile carriers, ushering in a new era of advanced Slow-Release Fertilizers (SRFs).

Keywords

Main Subjects


Albrecht TWJ, Addai-Mensah J and Fornasiero D, 2011. Effect of pH, concentration and temperature on copper and zinc hydroxide formation/precipitation in solution. Pp. 2100–2110. In: Chemeca 2011: Engineering a Better World: Sydney Hilton Hotel, NSW, Australia.
Bhattacharya N, Kochar M, Himadri B, Yang W and Cahill D, 2023. Biologically synthesized and indole acetic acid-loaded graphene as biostimulants for maize growth enhancement. ACS Agricultural Science & Technology3(5):432-444.  
Bremmer JM and Mulvancey, CS, 1982. Total nitrogen. Pp. 595-624. In: Page  AL, Miller RH and Keeney DR. (Ed.), Method of Soil Analysis. Part II. Agron. Monograph 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. USA.
Degryse F, Baird R and McLaughlin M, 2015. Diffusion and solubility control of fertilizer-applied zinc: chemical assessment and visualization. Plant and Soil 386: 195-204.
Gee GW and Bauder JW, 1986. Particle size analysis. Pp. 383 -411. In: Klute A, (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Ed., ASA, Madison, WI. USA.
Gil-Ortiz R, Naranjo MÁ, Ruiz-Navarro A, Atares S, García C, Zotarelli L, San Bautista A and Vicente O, 2020. Enhanced agronomic efficiency using a new controlled-released, polymeric-coated nitrogen fertilizer in rice. Plants9:1183. 
Hassan MU, Chattha MU, Ullah A, Khan I, Qadeer A, Aamer M, Khan AU, Nadeem F and Khan TA, 2019. Agronomic biofortification to improve productivity and grain Zn concentration of bread wheat. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology21:615-620. 
Hassan MU, Aamer M, Chattha MU, Haiying T, Shahzad B, Barbanti L, Nawaz M, Rasheed A, Afzal A and Liu Y,2020. The critical role of zinc in plants facing the drought stress. Agriculture10(9):396. 
Haluschak P, 2006. Laboratory methods of soil analysis. Canada-Manitoba Soil Survey, 3-133.        
 
Kabiri S, Tran DNH, Cole MA and Losic D, 2016. Functionalized three-dimensional (3D) graphene composite for high efficiency removal of mercury. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2: 390-402.
Lim SF and Lee A, 2015. Kinetic study on removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solution by using soil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22: 10144−10158.
Loeppert RH and Suarez DL, 1996. Carbonate and gypsum. Pp. 437- 474. In: Sparks DL, (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 3. 3rd ed. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Knudsen D, Peterson G A and Pratt PF, 1982. Lithium, sodium, and potassium. Pp. 225-246. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Madadrang CJ, Kim HY, Gao G, Wang N, Zhu J, Feng H, Gorring M, Kasner ML, and Hou S, 2012. Adsorption behavior of EDTA-graphene oxide for Pb (II) removal. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 4:1186- 1193.
Milani N, McLaughlin MJ, Stacey SP, Kirby JK, Hettiarachchi GM, Beak DG and Cornelis G, 2012. Dissolution kinetics of macronutrient fertilizers coated with manufactured zinc oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 60: 3991-3998.
Sparks DL, 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis (SSSA, ASA Publishing: Madison), Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Shabbir Z, Sardar A, Shabbir A, Abbas G, Shamshad S, Khalid S, Murtaza G, Dumat C and Shahid M, 2020. Copper uptake, essentiality, toxicity, detoxification and risk assessment in soil-plant environment. Chemosphere259:127436. 
Sitko R, Turek E, Zawisza B, Malicka E, Talik E, Heimann J, Gagor A, Feist B and Wrzalik R, 2013. Adsorption of divalent metal ions from aqueous solutions using graphene oxide. Dalton Transactions 42: 5682-5689.
Tran DNH, Kabiri S and Losic D, 2014. A green approach for the reduction of graphene oxide nanosheets using non-aromatic amino acids. Carbon 76:193-202.
Trenkel ME, 2010. Slow-and Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers: An Option for Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Agriculture. IFA, International Fertilizer Industry Association; Berlin, Germany.
Vejan P, Khadiran T, Abdullah R and Ahmad N, 2021.Controlled release fertilizer: A review on developments, applications and potential in agriculture. Journal of Controlled Release 339: 321-334.
Wang X, Liu C, Li H, Zhang H, Ma R, Zhang Q, Yang F, Liao Y, Yuan W and Chen F, 2019. Metabonomics-assisted label-free quantitative proteomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals novel insights into the antifungal effect of graphene oxide for controlling Fusarium graminearum. Environmental Science: Nano 6: 3401–3421.
Yang D, Velamakanni A, Bozoklu G, Park S, Stoller M, Piner RD, Stankovich S, Jung I, Field DA, Ventrice Jr and Ruoff RS, 2009. Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and Micro-Raman spectroscopy. Carbon 47: 145-153.
Yu Y, Addai-Mensah J and Losic D, 2012. Functionalized diatom silica microparticles for removal of mercury ions. Science and Technology of Advanced Materials 13: 015008.
Zhao G, Ren X, Gao X, Tan X, Li J, Chen C, Huang Y and Wang X, 2011. Removal of Pb(ii) ions from aqueous solutions on fewlayered graphene oxide nanosheets. Dalton Transactions 40:10945− 10952.
Zhao G, Wen T, Yang X, Yang S, Liao J, Hu J, Shao D and Wang X, 2012. Preconcentration of U(vi) ions on few-layered graphene oxide nanosheets from aqueous solutions. Dalton Transactions 41: 6182−6188.