Short-Term Effects of Organic Manure, Sulfur, and Sulfo-Barvar-1 Biofertilizer on Some Biological Properties of a Calcareous Soil

Authors

1 Assist. Prof. of Soil Biology and Biotechnology, Soil Science Department, University of Maragheh, Iran.

2 Assoc. Prof. of Soil Genesis, Classification and Evaluation, Soil Science Department, University of Maragheh, Iran.

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Most of the soils in Iran are affected by over-accumulation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3). It is estimated that more than 87 percent of the agricultural soils have more than 5% equivalent calcium carbonate. In these soils, the addition of elemental sulfur is known to be desirable for the elimination of nutritional disorders which has been caused by high pH. Sulfur could reduce soil pH and increase the bioavailability of elements like Fe, P and, etc. Such management also may change the environmental conditions around microbes in the soil and alter their activities in soil media. Soil quality is strongly depending on soil pH so, it will be affected by sulfur application in the soil. However, the impact of this management on soil biological activities has not received adequate attention. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sulfur as well as its integrated application with animal manure and Sulfo Baravar-1 containing sulfur oxidizing bacteria on the biological parameters of a calcareous soil.
Methodology
An unfertile soil sample was picked up from non-cultivated condition having 16% lime content. A factorial experiment as randomized complete blocks design was conducted with the elemental sulfur application (zero (S0), 1 % (S1), and 2 % (S2)), organic manure from cow waste (application of 1% cow manure and non-application), inoculation of Sulfo Baravar-1 Biofertilizer (inoculation and non-inoculation). The effects of treatments on soil pH and soil biological properties such as soil organic matter (SOM), soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and substrate induced respiration (SIR) were investigated for 60 days after treatments. Soil microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2), soil microbial quotient (qmic) and, the ratio of qCO2/SIR were calculated as well.
Findings
The results showed that, addition of sulfur, sulfur plus organic manure and, Sulfo Baravar-1 inoculation decreased soil pH. Most pH reduction was occurred at 2% sulfur application. In response to soil pH variation, soil respiration increased with different patterns between the treatments. Although, the sulfur application could increase soil basal respiration but, the highest value was seen in organic manure plus 2% sulfur treatment. Despite increasing of CO2 emission from the soil due to respiration, the meaningful variation in SOM was not seen in sulfur treatments. Organic manure application increased SOM content by 0.15 %. MBC increased by 52% and 72 % respectively in 1% and 2% sulfur application in respect to control. Organic manure application along with sulfur had a positive effect on MBC, but this trait was not affected by Sulfo Baravar-1 inoculation. The ratio of qCO2/SIR was reduced by sulfur application up to 98% in S1 and 400% in S2 treatments, respectively. The sulfur application with Sulfo Baravar-1 inoculation and without its inoculation decreased qmic by 47% and 80%, respectively. While, sulfur application along with manure shifted this trend vice versa and qmic increased 34% in respect to control (S0). Sulfur application also increased substrate induced respiration at S1 and S2 at a rate of 90% and 94%, respectively, and increased metabolic coefficient (qCO2) in S1 and S2 treatments 2.7 and 370%, respectively in respect to control. qmic and SIR were not affected by organic manure application and Sulfo Baravar-1 inoculation to the soil. Based on the results, there was a linear correlation between soil microbial biomass carbon, soil basal respiration (R2= 0.98) and qCO2 (R2=0.82). Substrate induced respiration had a relatively weaker correlation with soil microbial biomass carbon (R2=0.27).
Conclusion
All the treatments decreased soil pH compared to controls but, more decline of soil pH was observed in 2% sulfur applied treatments especially in organic manure plus sulfur application. SOM quantity and quality are important factors of soil quality as well as its sustainability. Sulfur application plus organic manure had a positive effect on SOM content, and qmic as an index of SOM quality. Therefore, the application of animal manure along with sulfur will increase soil quality as well as improves the soil pH. Due to the destructive effects of the sole application of elemental sulfur on soil biological traits, the application of sulfur is recommended with organic manure for the soils rich in calcium carbonate.

Keywords


Aliasgharzad N, 2011. Methods in Soil Biology (translated). University of Tabriz Press. 546 pages. (In Persian)
Ali-Ehiayi M and Behbahani AA, 1993. Description of soil chemical analysis methods. Soil and Water Research Institute. No: 892 Iran. (In Persian)
Amundson R, 2001. The carbon budget in soils. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 29: 535–562.
Anonymous, 2013. Intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC) 2013: the physical science basis. In: Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
Baltrus DA, 2017. Adaptation, specialization, and coevolution within phytobiomes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 38: 109–116.
Besharati H, 2014. Investigation the effects of sulfur with Thiobacillus species on some elements increasing ability in soil. MSc thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, university of Tehran. 176 pages. (In Persian with English abstract)
Birgander J, Rousk J and Olsson PA, 2014. Comparison of fertility and seasonal effects on grassland microbial communities. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 76: 80–89.
Bradford MA, Wieder W and Bonan G, 2016. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nature Climate Change 6: 751–758.
Cifuentes FR and Lindeman WC, 1993. Organic matter stimulation of elemental sulfur oxidation in a calcareous soil. Soil Science Society of American Journal 57(3):727-731.
Crecchio C, Curci M, Pellegrini A, Ricciuti P, Tursi N and Ruggiero P, 2007. Soil microbial dynamics and genetic diversity in soil under monoculture wheat grown in different long-term management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 39: 1391–1400.
Garcia-Orenes F, Morugan-Coronado A, Zornoza R and Scow K, 2013. Changes in soil microbial community structure influenced by agricultural management practices in a Mediterranean agro-ecosystem. Plos One 8(11): 1-9.
Gholami1 A, Ansouri A, Abbas dokht H and Fallah AR, 2015. Co-inoculation effects of Thiobacillus thiooxidans bacteria and mycorrhiza (Glomus spp.) on maize nutrition at different levels of sulfur. Journal of Water and Soil 29(3): 718-729. (In Persian with English abstract)
Gleixner G, 2013. Soil organic matter dynamics: a biological perspective derived from the use of compound-specific isotopes studies. Ecological Research 28: 683–695
Gupta VSR, Lawrence JR and Germida JJ, 1988. Impact of elemental sulfur fertilization on agricultural soils. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 68: 463-473.
Janzen HH, 2004. Carbon cycling in earth systems a soil science perspective. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 104: 399–417.
Kariminia A and Shabanpour M, 2003. Evalution of sulfur oxidation potential by heterotrophic microorganisms in different soil. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Sciences 17(1):68-79. (In Persian with English abstract)
Kaschuk G, Alberton O and Hungria M, 2010. Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42: 1–13.
Kumar M, Zeyad MT, Choudhary P, Paul S, Chakdar H, Vikram M and Rajawat S, 2020. Thiobacillus. Pp: 454-557. In: Amaresan N, Senthil Kumar M, Annapurna K, Kumar K and Sankaranarayanan A (eds). Beneficial Microbes in Agro-Ecology, Academic Press.
Lawrence JR and Germida JJ, 1988. Relationship between microbial biomass and elemental sulfur oxidation in agricultural soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52:672-677.
Malik AA, Puissant J, Buckeridge KM, Goodall T, Jehmlich N, Chowdhury S and Griffiths RI, 2018. Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nature communications 9(1), 3591.
Mirzapour MH, Khavazi K and Naeini MR, 2017. Effect of Sulfur, Thiobacillus and phosphorous application on canola yield and some soil chemical characteristics. Journal of Soil Biology 5(2): 109-121. (In Persian with English abstract)
Momen A, Pazoki A and Momayezi MR, 2011. Effects of granular sulfur (bentonitic) and compost on quantitive and qualitive characteristic of Bam with in Semnan region. Crop Physiology 3(9): 31-46. (In Persian with English abstract)
Msimbira Levini A and Smith Donald L, 2020. The roles of plant growth promoting microbes in enhancing plant tolerance to acidity and alkalinity stresses. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 4: 1-14.
Neina D, 2019. The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Applied and Environmental Soil Science:5794869, 1-9.
Pathiratna LSS, De UP, Waidyanatha S and Perirs OS, 1989. The effect of apatite and elemental sulfur mixtures on growth and p content of Centrocema pubescens. Fertilizer Research 21: 37-43.
Ram A, Kumar D, Babu S, Prasad D and Dev L. 2017. Effect of Sulphur on soil biological properties, residual fertility and yield of aerobic rice grown under aerobic rice-wheat cropping system in inceptisoil. Journal of Environmental Biology 38:587-596.
Rezaei SH, Khavazi K, Nezami MT and Saadat TS, 2013. Effects of sulfur, phosphorus, and plant on soil microbial and phosphatase activity. Iranian Journal of Soil Research. 27(2):218-226. (In Persian with English abstract)
Rousk J, Baath E, Brookes PC, Lauber CL, Lozupone C, Caporaso JG and. Fierer N, 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. The ISME Journal 4(10): 1340–1351.
Rousk J, Brookes PC and Baath E, 2009.Contrasting soil pH effects on fungal and bacterial growth suggest functional redundancy in carbon mineralization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(6): 1589–1596.
Souza RA, Teles TS, Machado W, Hungria M, Tavares FJ and Guimaraes MF, 2012. Effects of sugarcane harvesting with burning on the chemical and microbiological properties of the soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 155:1-6.
Souza RF, Brasil EPF, Figueiredo CC and Leandro WM, 2015. Soil microbial biomass and activity in wetlands located in preserved and disturbed environments in the Cerrado biome. Bioscience Journal 31(4): 1049-1061. 
Stroo HF and Alexander M, 1985. Role of soil organic matter in the effect of acid rain on nitrogen mineralization. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50: 218-223.
Tabak M, Lisowska A, Filipek-Mazur B and Antonkiewicz J, 2020. The effect of amending soil with waste elemental sulfur on the availability of selected macroelements and heavy metals. Processes 8: 1245.
Yangs Z, Stoven KS, Hanekilaus BR and Singh ES, 2010. Elemental sulfur oxidation by Thiobacillus spp. and aerobic heterotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. Pedosphere 20 (1): 71-79.
Zifcakova L, 2020. Factors affecting soil microbial processes. Pp: pp.439-461. In: Datta R, Meena RS, Pathan SI and Ceccherini MT (eds). Carbon and Nitrogen Cycling in Soil. Springer Singapore.