Comparison of RBF and MLP Neural Networks Performance for Estimation of Reference Crop Evapotranspiration

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

Evapotranspiration is one of the most important components of the hydrologic cycle. This complex phenomenon is related to several climatological factors. Over the last decades, Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) have shown a good ability for modeling complex and nonlinear systems. In the present research, the ability of Radial Basis Function (RBF) and Multi Layer Perceptron (MLP) neural networks in estimation of reference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) was studied. First, using meteorological dataset of 1951-2004 years for Tabriz Station, the mean values of monthly reference crop evapotranspiration were calculated by Penman-Monteith (PM) method. Then, using these calculated values as target outputs various networks with different structures were defined and trained. Finally, the capabilities of these networks for estimation of evapotranspiration were analyzed using some values of dataset that were not used in the training of neural networks. The obtained results showed that, the value of reference crop evapotranspiration might acutely be estimated (RMSE2>0.976 for validation dataset) when the parameters of average temperature and wind velocity were used as the inputs of model. Also, comparison of these two neural network results specified that MLP neural networks had a relatively more accuracy than RBF neural networks in estimation of ETo, and the only advantage of RBF neural networks was their much less time of training.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

سلطانی س و مرید س، 1384. مقایسه برآورد تابش خورشید با استفاده از روش­های هارگریوز – سامانی و   شبکه­های عصبی مصنوعی. دانش کشاورزی، جلد 15، شماره 1. صفحه­های 69-78.
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D and Smith M, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration, guideline for computing water requirements. Irrigation Drainage Paper No.56. FAO, RomeItaly.
Anonymous, 2007. Neural network toolbox 5, User's guide, 9th printing version 5. The Mathworks Inc. Massachusetts, USA.
BasheerIA and Hajmeer M, 2000. Artificial neural networks: fundamentals, computing, design, and application. J Microbiologic Meth 43: 3-31.
Chiew FHS, Kamaladassa NN, Malano HM and MacMahon TA, 1995, Penman-Monteith, FAO-24 reference crop evapotranspiration and class-A pan data in Australia. Agric Water Manage 28: 9-21.
Haykin S, 1999. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. NJ. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs.
JainSK, Singh VP and van Genuchten MTh, 2004. Analysis of soil water retention data using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Engin ASCE. 9 (5): 415-420.
Kumar M, RaghuwanshiNS, Singh R, Wallender, WW and Pruitt WO, 2002. Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Engin ASCE 128 (4): 224-233.
Rahimi Khoob A, 2008. Comparative study of Hargreaves’s and artificial neural network’s methodologies in estimating reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid environment. Irrigation Science 26: 253-259.
Sudheer KP and JainSK, 2003. Radial basis function neural network for modeling rating curves. J Hydrol Engin ASCE 8 (3): 161-164.
Zanetti SS, Sousa EF, Oliveira VPS, Almeida FT and Bernardo S, 2007. Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network and minimum climotological data. J Irrig and Drain Engin ASCE 133 (2): 83-89.
Water and Soil Science
Volume 19, Issue 1
May 2009
Pages 1-12

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics