بررسی روند شاخص‌های دبی کم جریان در رودخانه‌های منتخب استان لرستان

نویسندگان

1 دانشیارگروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد گروه مهندسی آب ، دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه تبریز

3 استادیارگروه مهندسی آب، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

 
مطالعه روند شاخص های کم آبی در مدیریت بهینه منابع آب اهمیت فراوانی دارد. در این مطالعه،روند دو شاخص کم­آبی (چندک­های 5 و 10 درصد) برای رودخانه­های قلیان، سرخاب، آب­سبزه، دره­تخت، کمندان، کاکاشرف، سراب­سفید و گله­رود در استان لرستان تحلیل شده است. بدین­منظور از داده­های دبی­ کم­آبی ایستگاه‌های منتخب در دوره های آماری متفاوت از 26 تا 62 سال استفاده گردید. روند هر کدام از سری­های کم­آبی با روش من-کندال مرسوم (نوع یک) و نوع دو،  پس از حذف اثر ضریب خودهمبستگی مرتبه یک معنی­دار تحلیل شد. همچنین شیب خط روند در هر یک از ایستگاه­های آب­سنجی با استفاده از روش تخمین­گر سن بدست آمد. نتایج نشان داد که مقادیر دبی کم­آبی رودخانه قلیان و رودخانه گله­رود، به ترتیب، در ایستگاه­های سکانه­نهایی و ونایی، با داشتن مقدار آماره Z برابر با 76/4- و 98/3- روند نزولی معنی­دار در سطح یک درصد داشتند. نتایج نشان داد که روند دبی­های کم­آبی چندک­های 5 و 10 درصد رودخانه آب­سبزه (در ایستگاه چم چیت) به ترتیب دارای مقدار آماره Z برابر با 52/4 و 46/4 (معنی­دار در سطح 1% ) بود. روند دبی­های کم آبی سایر ایستگاه­ها از نظر آماری معنی­دار نبود. تحلیل روند ایستگاه­های با دوره آماری مشترک نشان داد که تغییرات روند دبی های کم آبی در رودخانه­های استان لرستان مشابه یکدیگر نیستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Trends in Low Flows of the Selected Rivers in Lorestan Province

نویسندگان [English]

  • Yagob Dinpashoh 1
  • Pegah Heidari 2
  • Saeed Samadianfard 3
1 Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agric., Univ. of Tabriz, Iran
2 M.Sc student of Water Resources Engineering, Dept. of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agric., Univ. of Tabriz, Iran
3 Assist. Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agric., Univ. of Tabriz, Iran
چکیده [English]

Background and Objectives
Detection of trends in streamflow characteristics such as low flows is so important in optimal water resources management. This is especially true in arid and semi-arid climates that water is vital for human being and all other living things. Lorestan province, located in the west part of Iran was considered as the study area. Daily mean streamflow data of hydrometric stations during the time period provided by Lorestan Regional Water Company located in Khorramabad city. Eight hydrometric stations selected for this purpose. The altitude of the chosen stations varied between 770 and 2050 m above the mean sea level. Literature review on this subject indicated that low flow trends in Lorestan province river has not been before studied. On the other hand, such a study is so important for better management of fresh water in the region, therefore, conducting this study seems to be necessary.
Methodology
In the first step of this study, flow duration curves (FDC) plotted for the stations. Two indices including the Q0.05 and Q0.10 were considered here as measures of low flows. The Q0.05 index value extracted from the FDC as a five percent low flow quantile. This index shows that the streamflow discharge is less than that in five percent of the days in a year. In addition to Q0.05 the second measure namely Q0.10 is read from FDC of the selected sites. Therefore, for each site, these two indices were gathered during the used time period. Then, trends of the mentioned indices are analyzed using the Mann-Kendall method. In this regard the effect of serial correlations removed from the time series. Moreover, the slope of trend lines estimated using the Sen’s estimator approach. Then the selected quantiles fitted for suitable statistical distributions. In this regard the well-known method namely Kolmogorov—Smirnov was used.The parameters of the selected distribution estimated using the maximum likelihood method. Finally, at each site the values of low flows corresponding to different return periods i.e. 2, 5, 10, 25 and 50 years were estimated. It is worthy to mention that the missing data are not reconstructed here, because the used approach (Mann-Kendall) is a non-parametric method and no need for reconstruction of the missed values.
Findings
Results showed that two stations namely Sokaneh-Nahaee and Cham-Chit had significant first-lag serial correlation for Q010 time series. The other six sites had no significant serial correlation for this quantile. Furthermore, in the case of Q0.05, three sites showed significant first-lag serial correlations. So, the modified Mann-Kendall method was used for these time series. This analysis indicated that the mentioned series auto-correlation was significant in 5% level. The conventional MK method was used to detect trends in other time series which their serial correlations are not significant. Results showed that trends of Q0.10 quantile series in four out of the eight hydrometric stations were downward and two of them were statistically significant at 1% level. The two others had no significant trends. At the same time the other sites showed upward trends in Q0.10 series. However, among these series one station namely Cham-Chit had statistically upward trend at 1% level. Trends in the other three sites are not statistically significant.  In the case of Q0.05 series, the six out of the eight stations showed negative trends, in which two sites had statistically significant trends at 1% level. The names of these sites are Sokaneh-Nahaee and Vanaee. In contrast, the two other time series showed positive trends, in which only one of them (namely Cham-Chit station) had statistically significant trend at 1% level. The trend line slopes of Q0.10 quantile time series are ranged between -0.0844 (in Sokaneh-Nahaee) and +0.12 (in Cham-Chit). However, in the case of Q0.05, this range was between -0.0885 (in Sokaneh-Nahaee) and +0.008 (in Cham-Chit station).
Conclusion
Some of the stations showed upward trends in low flows in Lorestan province rivers and some others showed downward trends. It is worthy to note that the time periods of the used data of the stations are not same. Although Masih et al. (2011) reported that the mean daily stream flows (i.e. Q0.50 or 50th quantile also called median) of Zagros Mountain rivers had downward trends. Investigation of sites location indicated that no obvious pattern in trends of low flows existed in the area under studied. This is true for both two low flow indices (i.e. Q0.05 and Q0.10) used for hydrometric stations. The findings of this study would be helpful in better management of surface water in Lorestan province.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sen's estimator
  • Low flow
  • Lorestan
  • Mann-Kendall
  • Auto-correlation
Ahn KH and Merwade V, 2017. The effect of land cover change on duration and severity of high and low flows. Hydrological Processes 31(1):133-149.
Assani AA, Chalifour A, Légaré G, Manouane CS and Leroux D, 2011. Temporal regionalization of 7-day low flows in the St. Lawrence watershed in Quebec (Canada). Water Resources Management 25(14):3559-3574.
Azizabadi Farahani M and Khalili D, 2013. Seasonality characteristics and spatio-temporal trends of 7-day low flows in a large, semi-arid watershed. Water Resources Management 27(14):4897-4911. (In Persian with English abstract)
Coch A and Mediero L, 2016. Trends in low flows in Spain in the period 1949–2009. Hydrological Sciences Journal 61(3):568-584.
De Wit MJ, Van Den Hurk BJ, Warmerdam PM, Torfs PJ, Roulin E and Van Deursen WP, 2007. Impact of climate change on low-flows in the river Meuse. Climatic Change 82(3):351-372.
Dinpashoh Y, Singh VP, Biazar SM and Kavehkar S, 2019. Impact of climate change on streamflow timing (case study: Guilan Province). Theoretical and Applied Climatology 138(1):65-76.
Douglas EM, Vogel RM and Kroll CN, 2000. Trends in floods and low flows in the United States: impact of spatial correlation. Journal of Hydrology 240(1-2):90-105.
Ehsanzadeh E and Adamowski K, 2007. Detection of trends in low flows across Canada. Canadian Water Resources Journal 32(4):251-264.
Engeland K and Hisdal H, 2009, A comparison of low flow estimates in ungauged catchments using regional regression and the HBV-model. Water Resources Management 23(12):2567-2586.
Gain AK, Immerzeel WW, Sperna Weiland FC and Bierkens MF, 2011. Impact of climate change on the stream flow of the lower Brahmaputra: trends in high and low flows based on discharge-weighted ensemble modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(5):1537-1545.
Ghezel saflo M, Dinpashoh Y, Ghorbani M and Fakheri-Fard A. 2012. Trend analysis of streamflows in East Azarbayjan province. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 35(1): 71-82. (In Persian with English abstract)
Gheisoori M, Soltani-Gerdefaramarzi S and Ghasemi M, 2018. Investigation and prediction of the changing trend of climate parameters on discharge (Case Study: Godarkhosh Sub-basin). Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards 7(17): 137-154. (In Persian with English abstract)
Gottschalk L, Yu KX, Leblois E and Xiong L, 2013. Statistics of low flow: Theoretical derivation of the distribution of minimum streamflow series. Journal of Hydrology 481:204-219.
Hannaford J and Marsh T, 2006. An assessment of trends in UK runoff and low flows using a network of undisturbed catchments. International Journal of Climatology: Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 26(9):1237-1253.
Jafari M, Dinpashoh Y and Asadi E, 2016. Introduction to multiple linear regression and its application to simulate daily pan evaporation. Journal of Water and Sustainable Development 2(2): 67-76. (In Persian with English abstract)
Kanani R, Fakheri Fard A, Ghorbani MA and Dinpashoh Y, 2021. Trend analysis of the streamflow in the Lighvan River Hydrometric Stations (upstream and downstream). Journal of Watershed Management Research 11(22): 11-19. (In Persian with English abstract)
Kendall MG, 1948. Rank Correlation Methods. Griffin.
Keshtkar AR, 2015. Low flow frequency analysis by L-moments method (Case study: Iranian Central Plateau River Basin). Desert 20(2):167-175. (In Persian with English abstract)
Kormos PR, Luce CH, Wenger SJ and Berghuijs WR, 2016. Trends and sensitivities of low streamflow extremes to discharge timing and magnitude in Pacific Northwest Mountain streams. Water Resources Research 52(7):4990-5007.
Kroll C, Luz J, Allen B and Vogel RM, 2004. Developing a watershed characteristics database to improve low streamflow prediction. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 9(2):116-125.
Li D, Long D, Zhao J, Lu H and Hong Y, 2017. Observed changes in flow regimes in the Mekong River basin. Journal of Hydrology 551:217-232.
Mann HB, 1945. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3): 245-259.
Masih I, Uhlenbrook S, Maskey S and Smakhtin V, 2011. Streamflow trends and climate linkages in the Zagros mountains, Iran. Climatic Change 104(2):317-338.
Mirabassi R and Dinpazhooh Y, 2013. Trend analysis of precipitation of NW of Iran over the past half of the century. Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 35(4): 59-73. (In Persian with English abstract)
Modarres R, 2008. Regional frequency distribution type of low flow in north of Iran by L-moments. Water Resources Management 22(7):823-841. (In Persian with English abstract)
Mozayyan M, Akhoond-Ali AM, Massah-Bavani AR, Radmanesh F and Zohrabi N, 2015. The impact of climate change on low flows (Case Study: Sepid Dasht Sezar). Irrigation Sciences and Engineering 38(2):1-9. (In Persian with English abstract)
Requena AI, Ouarda TB and Chebana F, 2018. Low-flow frequency analysis at ungauged sites based on regionally estimated streamflows. Journal of Hydrology 563:523-532.
Sheikh Z, Yazdani MR and Nia AM, 2020. Spatiotemporal changes of 7-day low flow in Iran’s Namak Lake Basin: impacts of climatic and human factors. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 139(1):57-73. (In Persian with English abstract)
Sheikh Z, Yazdani MR and Moghaddam Nia A, 2019. Evaluation of spatio-temporal changes of flow duration curve seasonal indexes (FDCSI) in four decades in Namak Lake basin. Iran-Water Resources Research 15(2): 32-56. (In Persian with English abstract)
Smakhtin VU, 2001. Low flow hydrology: a review. Journal of Hydrology 240(3-4):147-86.
Tian J, Chang J, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wu Y and Jiang T, 2019. Influence of Three Gorges Dam on downstream low flow. Water 11(1):65-80.
Tongal H, Demirel MC and Booij MJ, 2013. Seasonality of low flows and dominant processes in the Rhine River. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 27(2):489-503.
Vafakhah M, Bakhshi TM and Khazaei M, 2012. Analysis of rainfall and discharge trend in Kashafrood watershed. Geography and Development 10(29):77-90. (In Persian with English abstract)
Vezza P, Comoglio C, Rosso M and Viglione A, 2010. Low flows regionalization in north-western Italy. Water Resources Management 24(14):4049-4074.
Vogel RM and Fennessey NM, 1990. Flow-duration curves. I: New interpretation and confidence intervals. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 120(4):485-504.
Vogel RM and Kroll CN, 1991. The value of streamflow record augmentation procedures in low-flow and flood-flow frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrology 125(3-4):259-276.
Yue S and Wang CY, 2004. Scaling of Canadian low flows. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 18(5):291-305.